In addition into the primary punishment, the court may impose a fine on the offender. The fine’s amount is within the discretion from the court and is intended to serve as an additional deterrent.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon by the prosecution against the petitioner and his above mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that hearth-arm injury which was fatal on the deceased was caused with the petitioner but in support of opinion on the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is obtainable within the file and mere ipsi dixit of police just isn't binding around the Court.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to your period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it correct to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment with the grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to be created.
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge on the Judgment within time. Read more
The regulation as recognized in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight more info supplied to any reported judgment might count on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[7]
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its possible to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity on the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of such changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a strong legal system.
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only accomplished If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In the United States, persons are not required to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their personal can remember a single rule of thumb when it concerns referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you possibly can, leading the court, not only to your case, but towards the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.